“Even the most perfect reproduction of a work of art is lacking in
one element: its presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place
where it happens to be. This unique existence of the work of art determined the
history to which it was subject throughout the time of its existence…changes of
ownership are subject to a tradition which must be traced from the situation of
the original.”
– Literary Theory
page 1235
Question: Does having Marjane Satrapi’s The Complete Persepolis as a graphic novel accomplish a sort of
reproduction?
Walter Benjamin, in The Work
of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, talks about the way
reproductions alter a work of art by making it visible to those not
experiencing its uniqueness in its original position in space and time. The
story of the Iranian Revolution and Marji’s life as a whole are both told
through The Complete Persepolis in
the form of a graphic novel. It can be argued that this form of storytelling
changes these two events into works of art. However, readers aren’t
experiencing them firsthand; they’re experiencing the reproductions Satrapi has
put out for the public to see.
This method may just be the best way for her to explain these
occurrences, though. It brings events that happened years earlier to the comic
book form and therefore maybe more relative to those in today’s time. The pictures
are Satrapi’s way of reproducing the events she recalls from her childhood.
Readers aren’t getting the unique experience Satrapi had, but are in fact given
the opportunity to make it their own. The ownership is being changed by this
reproduction and therefore becoming relatable to readers by not only words, but
pictures.
No comments:
Post a Comment